Welcome to Yo Ho Ho, NABOR!

My Scale for Rating Rum Keep in mind as you read my reviews and ratings that I'm giving you my opinions from a unique perspective. So here's that view of rum that impacts my ratings.

1. I really, really don't like spiced or flavored rum.

2. I've discovered a preference for aging that transcends price.

3. Too much alcohol or too much of a burn straight up hides the quality of rum.

4. I'm surprisingly unswayed by others' opinions of rums, but I am driven to try rums about which others rave.

5. I gave up trying and rating cheaper rums with the exception of some novelty rums.

6. A typical tasting is both straight up and with Diet Coke.

7. I'm not much of a drinker. I don't have more than two drinks in an evening. So I really savor my rum and Diet Cokes.

My Rating Scale 1 to 10, Worst to Best No quibbling over decimal points; although, I have gone back and changed ratings--and reserve the authority to do so again.

The lowest three ratings are just rather poor rums that I don't like.
1 = Pour it out. 2 = Rub it on. 3 = Give it away.

The next three ratings mix with my Diet Coke, and I can be polite about them in company.
4 = Mix it very well. 5 = Mix it. 6 = Accept the gift, but don't regift.

The 7's are a conundrum. They knocked on the door, but the knock on them is typically too much alcohol bite.
7 = Don't turn it down.

These are the rums I hope to get when dining out or in a bar.
8 = Put it on the Top Shelf. 9 = Write it at the Top of the List.


These rums are so far above the others that everyone who tastes them instantly realizes they are special.
10 = Mark it as the Ultimate Rum.

Value Ratings The value ratings are calculated by squaring a rum's rating and dividing by the price for a 750 ml bottle. The very expensive ones don't compete on value. The really bad ones can't overcome their 1 or 2 ratings. This helps find the 8's and 9s that deliver the best taste for the money.

Thursday, March 29, 2012


360 Years of Ligons Pour out and Pore over Rum

“… the drinke of the Iland, which is made of the skimmings of the Coppers, that boyle the Sugar, which they call kill-Divell.”  From A True and Exact History of the Island of Barbados, Richard Ligon, 1657, London.

Kill-Divell is the earliest reference in recorded history to rum.  Based upon Richard Ligon’s travels to Barbados circa 1647. 

Indeed, my very own ancestor Richard was the first to write about rum.  He documented the emergence of kill-divell (aka kill-devil) from its origin in Barbados in the 1600’s. 

Ironically, I discovered this ancestral connection when I Googled my own name to see if this rum blog was being found by the search engines.  Imagine my reaction when the top hits were all Richard Ligon from 1647.  An incredible 360 years after Richard Ligon was tasting and commenting on kill-divell in Barbados, this Ligon began a quest to find the best kill-divell descendent. 

The full quote from Uncle Richard’s book is “We are seldome drye or thirsty, unlesse we overheat our bodyes with extraordinary labour, or drinking strong drinks; as of our English spirits, which we carry over, of french Brandy, or the drinke of the Iland, which is made of the skimmings of the Coppers, that boyle the Sugar, which they call kill-Divell.” 

Apparently not only did I get my interest in rum from Uncle Richard, but also my spelling skills.  I copied and pasted this passage from his book into Word and Spellcheck overloaded.  The only words spelled correctly were capitalized wrong.  A message asked me if I wanted to submit an error report to Microsoft.  The detail in the message said that in proofing spelling,  anytime 20% of the words are incorrect, they assume Spellcheck is malfunctioning.  Hey, this is rum.  I figure 80 proof is normal, right?  

Uncle Richard's book is in the Smithstonian.  This blog--probably headed for another type of institution.  


If you are interested in Richard Ligon's legacy, here's the best article about him.



2 comments:

  1. Microsoft will be happy to know that the Spellcheck overload was due to: 1. the year in which the book was written and 2. the number of samples of "kill-Divell" drank during the process of writing. I'm sure Uncle Richard had as much fun writing the book as you are having writing the sequel.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Indeed. I should have mentioned that Richard was the same age as I am now when he wrote his book 360 years ago. Guess it takes a Ligon awhile to get around to jotting down his thoughts.

    ReplyDelete